The only newsletter that scans and analyzes the full breadth of regulatory developments every day. Written and curated by Rob Garver for SourceMedia.

10.12.17 - It was either a calculated gamble or a display of utter certainty on Wednesday, when the Financial Times released a lengthy story describing a “crisis of confidence” among central bankers. The worry, according to the FT, centers on their ability to manage inflation and unemployment using the traditional tools of monetary policy. Indeed, it asks whether those tools have ever really operated in the way they were thought to in the first place.

The story came out on the same day that minutes from the September meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee were released, creating at least the possibility that the official record of the discussion among the Federal Reserve Board members and the Federal Reserve Bank presidents might douse the theory in cold water by displaying a level of confidence and certainty about the direction of inflation in the US.

It did not.

The result of the meeting was a unanimous vote to keep interest rates stable for the time being, but the minutes reveal concern bordering on confusion about the current state of inflation. All the indicators that would normally point to rising inflation are in place -- and have been for an extended period of time. Unemployment is low, economic growth is rising, interest rates remain near historic lows. But inflation stubbornly refuses to move toward the Fed’s two percent target rate.

“Many participants expressed concern that the low inflation readings this year might reflect not only transitory factors but also the influence of developments that could prove more persistent,” the minutes read.

“Some participants discussed the possibility that secular trends, such as the influence of technological innovations on competition and business pricing, also might have been muting inflationary pressures and could be intensifying,” the document added. “It was noted that other advanced economies were also experiencing low inflation, which might suggest that common global factors could be contributing to persistence of below-target inflation in the United States and abroad.”

It was at that point that things apparently got a little bit meta, and members began discussing the impact current inflation rates might have on future inflation numbers, largely by influencing the public’s expectations about what “normal” inflation really is.

“Several [FOMC members] expressed concern that the persistence of low rates of inflation might imply that the underlying trend was running below 2 percent, risking a decline in inflation expectations. If so, the appropriate policy path should take into account the need to bolster inflation expectations in order to ensure that inflation returned to 2 percent and to prevent erosion in the credibility of the Committee's objective.”

Overall, the September minutes reinforce a point made in this space before: The Fed doesn’t know what’s going on with regard to the interplay between monetary policy, inflation, and unemployment.

In Wednesday’ Financial Times article, Chris Giles made a powerful argument that the problem isn’t limited to Washington, but is global, extending to the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and beyond.

To their credit central bankers are becoming more and more honest about it, admitting that the economic models they have been using to try to steer the economy for a generation may not really reflect reality. “[T]here is increasing concern, even expressed by [Fed Chair Janet] Yellen, that the underlying theoretical model might simply be rotten to the core and attempts to tweak it are futile,” Giles writes.

He adds this damning observation from Daniel Tarullo, who served on the Fed board for eight years ending in April: “Essentially you are setting policy on things you don’t know and can’t measure and then reasoning after the fact.”

Tarullo’s “core argument,” Giles adds, “is that central banks maintain an absolute faith in the model with absolutely no evidence to support it.”

To be fair to central bankers, the article also demonstrates that their faith has been badly shaken. The problem now is figuring out what they really should believe.

Like what you've just read? Get it in your inbox first-thing every morning.

Today’s Key Reads

CAQ foresees risks during upcoming audits
Accounting Today - The Center for Audit Quality has released two new member alerts spotlighting some of the potential risks facing audit firms during the upcoming 2017 audit cycle.

Why banks should be more like software companies
American Banker - The job title "head of emerging technology" is freighted with self-assurance; it seems to imply that someone holding such a position should be able to peer, Nostradamus-like, through the veil of futurity and bring back knowledge of the shape of things to come.

OCC's Friend to step down as chief counsel
American Banker - Amy Friend, the chief counsel of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, will retire on Nov. 11, the agency said late Wednesday. Friend has served in the job since 2013, where she led the agency's legal team and oversaw efforts to implement the Dodd-Frank Act.

FDIC's Hoenig warns of deposit insurance downside: Moral hazard
American Banker - The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s second-highest official warned Wednesday that the deposit insurance system, while providing customers with "a sense of security," still poses moral hazard risk that can result in riskier behavior on the part of banks.

M&T's Wilmington Trust to pay $44M to settle allegations of loan fraud
American Banker - M&T Bank’s Wilmington Trust unit has agreed to pay $44 million to settle an investigation into alleged loan fraud. The Justice Department and Wilmington Trust agreed to a $60 million settlement figure, with Wilmington Trust receiving credit for $16 million previously paid to the Securities and Exchange Commission for other matters.

Inside payday lenders’ plan to scuttle CFPB rule
Credit Union Journal - The payday lending industry is planning to use a familiar playbook in its effort to fight the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s new rule restricting short-term loans. The regulation comes just three months after the bureau rolled out restrictions on mandatory arbitration clauses, spurring financial services groups to turn to Congress and the courts in an effort to quash it. While that effort has not yet borne fruit, payday lending advocates are following the same path as they begin their own fight.

Extra Credit

Five Things to Watch for in Bank Earnings
Wall Street Journal - Large banks, on the whole, are expected to report higher earnings in the third quarter than they did in the second. But analysts will be watching for signs of trouble ahead if loan demand keeps declining and trading operations continue to see decreased demand for their services.

Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Case Against Jordan’s Arab Bank
Wall Street Journal - Thousands of Israelis are using a law passed in 1789 to sue a Jordanian bank in US federal court over terror attacks half a world away. The Supreme Court is being asked to decide if that sort of suit should even be allowed.

Bitcoin races to new record peak, shaking off September stumble
Financial Times - After a month in which it looked as though the world’s most well-known cryptocurrency may have hit a wall, the price of bitcoin soared to well over $5,000, eclipsing a previous high.

Maria Made Puerto Rico’s Giant Debt Even Trickier for Hedge Funds
Bloomberg - A massive infusion of taxpayer money into Puerto Rico could complicate matters for the island’s bondholders, who risk being seen as profiteering off of federal disaster assistance if they continue to demand full payment from the troubled territory’s government.